1. Gov20LA Every event I attend, I gain a new perspective on the constantly changing industry I work in (Gov2.0, OpenGov, Citizen Engagement – to mention a few names for it). Gov20LA was great for me for several reasons: 1. Networking – zowie! 2. Getting an outside the beltway view of what we’re all doing here – incredibly valuable. And 3. Amazing food. No seriously – DC has got nothing on LA – and for anyone that followed my tweetstream (@wmburke) during that time, you know what I’m talking about.
2. Industry Focus The focus in this industry has been on ‘technology in government’ and is changing/ needs to change to ‘citizen-centric government’ (or perhaps ‘citizen participation’ or some other term that captures the idea even better).
3. My Role My background is in ‘things’ – engineering, product design, manufacturing, etc. but what I’m being asked to do by others all relates to ‘people’. I’ve been struggling with this adjustment, but it feels right. My role is to bring people together, to educate and inform, to connect, to facilitate the creation of things that I alone would not be able to accomplish.
4. ParticipationCamp is coming together, transformed and reborn from last year’s eDemocracyCamp. April 17th and 18th, right before POLC, with a focus on ‘advancing public participation in government by connecting government managers and staff, public engagement experts, online tool developers, and citizens’.
5. Workshop: Creating GREAT Citizen Engagement Software is up and taking registrations at http://j.mp/GREATces. This is our first event that we are charging real money for and it’s coming together fabulously. It’s target audience is developers, and the goal is to really boost their ability to build great software in this market and work together to connect citizens to their representatives. Have a look and spread the word.
6. HillCamp This is a little side project I’ve been working on for some time that is finally starting to come together. The idea is to have a staffers only unconference on Capital Hill to discuss use of social media for citizen engagement. After all, the staffers are the only experts in the sense of on-the-ground experience working within their unique situation. This could really boost comprehension and use of these tools within Congressional offices.

Alright, enough from me for this week (month). When I write it out all short like that, it doesn’t look like nearly as much as it felt like going through it. Nonetheless, I think we’re poised to have a GREAT month.

• The fabulous Kelli Shewmaker (co-organizer of Social Justice Camp) has agreed to help develop our volunteer coordination system. The goal is to make it easy for anyone interested in the future of government to get involved in making it better.
• Art Bushkin joined our Advisory Board this week. Art has been around the Internet (or its predecessors) for more than 40 years and honored me by saying, “I meet hundreds, even thousands of people, but there’s a reason I’m sitting here with you.”
• Preparing to launch a fundraising campaign focused on engaging 2,010 donors in 2010.
• Working on several upcoming events that will be announced when they are ready!
• Met with Britt Blaser to discuss the great work he’s doing with iVote4U. Is this the future of citizen to government communication?
• Jim Gilliam made some minor tweaks on GovLuv that should improve its performance and stop those pesky error pages – we’ll see. They’ve been difficult to track down!
• Discussed GovLuv with Karina Newton, Director of New Media for Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s office. She likes it! It’s easy to see why she is where she is – she’s intelligent, personable, quick-witted, and on top of her game. Impressive.
• Met with Daniel Bennett of the e-Citizen Foundation during our (new, but planned to be regular) Open Gov @ Open City meetup. They’re working on some great stuff and we discussed ways that we could work together to accomplish even more.
• Had my first discussion with Billy Grundfest (Hollywood writer – Mad About You, etc…) – he and I will be working together to manage the Language of Gov2.0 track at Gov20LA this coming weekend. He’s so much fun and quick to grasp ideas – it’s going to be an amazing weekend!

January 18 – 24 was a busy week.

• Started off the week by meeting with Lucas Cioffi to discuss how the Open Government Directive Workshop had gone and to open a new idea, which is the next item.
• Submitted to the eDemocracyCamp planning team that we should change its focus to that of bringing together the dialogue and deliberation community (eg, NCDD), developers working in the citizen engagement space, and government employees and staffers (credit where credit is due: Kaliya Hamlin originated this idea).
• I re-organized myself with a GTD tool called Doit.im
• Connected with VoteSmart about updating information that we find wrong when working with GovLuv (for those unfamiliar, VoteSmart provides the back-end database of elected officials that we use for GovLuv).
• Met with the ED and staff of the Republican Study Committee to show them GovLuv – they were very impresssed and are excited to pass it on to their 130 or so members of the House of Representatives.
• I spoke with Britt Blaser on Friday. He is working on a citizen engagement platform called IVote4U that comes complete with a Facebook app. Doing some very exciting work!
• Gong Szeto, thinker extraordinaire, and I had a great conversation about the future of the citizen engagement space during which he gave me a brilliant idea for a conference that we could facilitate. More on that as the details come into focus.
• Finally, we ended the week with a fundraising meeting between myself, Meagen, and Dave. 2010 is about monetary sustainability and we’re taking it seriously.

I’m also considering doing these as short videos, although I haven’t gotten it all together yet. Let’s see if this tiny note provides any impetus for figuring that out…

It’s on the Majority Whip’s website. There are other versions on the Majority Leader’s website, the Minority Whip’s website, and I presume on the Minority Leader’s website, but they were all more difficult to read than this one (and this one’s a doozy).

So here’s something that will help it to make more sense: recesses are not called recesses. They are District Work Periods! Isn’t that great?!? District Work Periods are in red. The House convened on January 11 and hopes to adjourn on October 8th.

Anyway, here’s the brief of what happened the week of January 11 – 17:

• Personally, I’m feeling better – Yay!! I’ve been sick since New Year’s Eve.
• I attended the Open Government Directive (OGD) Workshop on Monday. This was a free event put together by Lucas Cioffi to give federal agency employees help and support in implementing the OGD on its tight timelines. It was well done and  seemed productive for the majority of attendees.
• Tuesday I met with Kaliya Hamlin (unconference.net), who was in town from San Francisco to facilitate the OGD Workshop (she also facilitated CongressCamp back in September). We discussed may things, including how to run unconferences and the need for one specifically focused on bringing together the dialogue & deliberation community, the techies working in the citizen engagement space, and government employees.
• I sent a rough draft of a budget to Board members Nisma (Secretary) and Patrick (Treasurer) to review.
• Board President Dave, Meagen (fundraising committee chair), and I had 2 fundraising meetings this week. 2010 is the year of monetary sustainability for Open4m. We have some exciting things coming together, but I’ll save the details for the official announcements!
• Friday night I got the opportunity to facilitate an unconference on Saturday – Social Justice Camp was a rousing success (socialjusticecamp.org) and allowed me to practice my Open Space Technology skills (the process behind most unconferences). This was an important opportunity for me as I anticipate we will be running many more unconferences in the future.

Onwards and Upwards,
Wayne

I think the fun part of it is that while we ARE exempt under section 501(c)(3), our Public Charity Status is:

• 509(a)(1) & 170(b)(1)(A)(vi)

That pretty much rocks, huh? As in:

“Are you a 501c3?”

“We are exempt from Federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, but we are actually a 509(a)(1) & 170(b)(1)(A)(vi).”

Do you think that’s said 170-B-1-A-V-I or 170-B-1-A-6? I don’t know, but I’m going to try to work it into conversation – we’ll see how that goes!

Here’s the actual letter if you want to read it and here’s a link to all of our legal documents with full details.

Now you know what that means! We can finally start a full-blown fund drive. They’ll be more about that in the next couple of days, but if you want to get a jump start on making us sustainable and donate today, please do.

As 2009 draws to a close, we consider our past accomplishments and prepare for new ones. As an organization, we are now in an exciting position where our opportunities exceed our capacity: that is to say that if we had more resources, we would be accomplishing more than we are.

If you haven’t yet donated to the Open Forum Foundation, please consider doing so. In addition, please consider sharing this message with everyone that you know (direct link). Together, we will create responsive government!

A Vision for the Future: Responsive Government

The quality of a government is determined by the quality of its citizens, and we are at a critical time in history for the development of government. Never before has it been possible for every citizen of a country to participate in the decision-making process, but new tools developed on the Internet are making that feasible.

This doesn’t mean the transition will be quick – or easy! Government is entrenched in centuries of internal culture, precedents, rules, and regulations. Some of these are very important; some of them need to go; but deciding which is which will be an effort that lasts for years and impacts the entire world.

Our mission is to ensure that the end result of this transition is responsive government. We do this through three main methods:

1. Education. We educate, inform, and connect the elected leaders, government staff, technology developers, and organizations that are on the forefront of this transition.
2. Technology. We promote the use and development of technologies that enable inclusive and meaningful political dialogue, while lowering the barriers to entry for both citizens and government representatives.
3. Research. We engage in research that illuminates the current state of affairs and proposes paths for a smooth transition.

Our Projects

This is not all that we’re working on, but it is what we’re currently most proud of.

GovLuv connects you instantly with your government representatives through the magical power of Twitter. It shows messages sent both to AND from your reps, filters them in a number of different ways, and enables you to join the conversation. Visit GovLuv.org to see for yourself.

CongressCamp began as a barcamp to discuss “transforming citizen engagement with Congress through social media and collaboration tools.” The event was a huge success, and the momentum is spawning more events and the development of educational resources. Visit CongressCamp.org for more information or to get involved.

Mapping Political Communication is a joint project with George Washington University’s Institute for Politics, Democracy & the Internet to understand how political communication flows today. This knowledge will help us to understand how the transition is occurring and how best to support it. While still in an early phase, the results of this research will be made available for public use and scrutiny once they are presentable.

How to get involved

If you’re still reading, something must have piqued your interest. Don’t let that die:

• Share this message with others via email, Twitter, or Facebook.
• Contact Wayne to get involved.
• Browse the website to learn more.
• Donate.

We have committed our lives to this. If you believe in it also, share what you have to offer. Everyone on the planet stands to benefit.

Onwards and Upwards!

I received the full amount in 6 donations.

What?

S.i.x.   d.o.n.a.t.i.o.n.s.
Among those are 4 averaging $125 each, one for $1000, and one for “the rest of the amount”.

I would not have thought it possible, but here I am at the receiving end of kindnesses that I could not have imagined previously. How do I justify it?

It’s not about me – I’ll explain:

Now that people have contributed money to the Open Forum Foundation, I get it. It’s different. Thirteen months ago, I established a board who owns the organization and is legally responsible for everything I do. I then became an employee of the Open Forum Foundation. But still, it was really mine – everyone knew that. I founded it. I did all the work. I put everything I have into this for a year and a half. I built all the connections, established the understanding, facilitated the projects. And, I spent all the money – it was all my money, so who really cared. I mean, I was careful with it, knowing that someday it wouldn’t be all mine, but it was really just an academic exercise, wasn’t it.

Until now.

Now, it’s not mine. Now, I don’t own it. Now, it’s not my money. Now, I’m not alone.

Six souls have joined the Open Forum Foundation. Six people have said that they believe we are positioned to make a significant impact in how government to citizen communication operates. Six people have stepped up and told me without words that they trust what I have done, but their is an implicit statement that I see in this trust: I am no longer working for myself, I am working for the community. Everything that I do for the Open Forum Foundation is no longer for me – it for the donors and the board members and the volunteers and the interns.

Everyone has a part to play and mine is facilitating the interaction between the rest of the parts to make sure they add up to something. Mine is ensuring that everyone understands how their contribution leads to greater things, how it ensures that the system takes shape, how it creates legitimate channels of communication between citizens and their government representatives, how it paves the way to a new era of responsive government.

There is much to do, and I will do everything I can to make it happen and make it be fun to be a part of.

Onward and Upward!

So here’s the deal: first in a professional version like you’d get from any traditional nonprofit, and then a personal version, letting you know exactly where we’re at and a little more about the trials and tribulations that I’ve experienced getting here.

Professional Version

In a very short period of time, the Open Forum Foundation has gone from being nobody to being well-connected in the DC tech and politics scene. We have GovLuv up and running, making political conversations on Twitter more productive; had a successful CongressCamp with an excellent mix of Hill staffers and social media experts, which is slowly evolving into something greater; and are working with George Washington University’s Institute for Politics, Democracy & the Internet to Map Political Communication.

We are at the heart of a growing movement to enable governments to be responsive to their citizens, are just beginning to build a community to take this all to the next level, and are well-positioned to actually make it happen.

This is where you come in. Everything that we’re doing is for citizens. According to Abraham Lincoln, we also need to fill the of and by portions.

Are you passionate about citizen’s rights? Individual liberties? Do you want to get involved in something that has enough momentum to make a real difference – today and into the foreseeable future?

Soon we’ll be releasing a list of activities that we need assistance with but in the meantime, our largest concern is money. While I have done my best to ignore this fact up until now, nothing is sustainable without it. If you see the value in what we’re doing, please donate right now at http://donate.openforumfoundation.org/. It only takes a minute and it will be the start of your involvement in a great community.

Personal Version

Hi.

I’ve done really well in DC accomplishing what I set out to do. I talked about all that stuff above. But let’s be realistic, I have also failed in one important regard: funding. This is not to say that I’ve asked a bunch of people and they’ve said no. More to the point, I’ve been able to survive on my past savings (and then credit) to get to where I am today. From the outside, this is clearly not sustainable. From the inside, there were more fun things to do and I had no role model to look to for asking for help. It’s something I’ve never done, and while I perceived that as a strength, I now understand that it is a weakness. What I set out to accomplish, I cannot do alone.

Nor can it be accomplished with a dozen board members, volunteers, and interns – even if they are fabulous. It requires a huge community that shares the vision and is willing to put in the time and money required to bring it to fruition.

And the vision is to enable responsive government. Globally. For every individual on the planet.

The time has come for me to open up myself and the Open Forum Foundation. We are well-positioned to be the vessel for that change. If this is your issue – your passion, then this is your organization as much as it is mine – or at least it should be.

My role is to organize and delegate and keep things moving and expand the network that we’ve established. Your role is to come up with great ideas, to evangelize, to design and code, to maintain websites, to contribute your knowledge, to help with grant writing and funding. In short to do all the little things that make it possible to accomplish miracles.

This epiphany was brought on me, as many are, by lack of options: IF we raise $3500 by November 15th, I personally won’t bounce any checks — and at this point, that seems pretty exciting.

Then, we will need $5000 by 12/15 and another $5000 by 1/15. You get the picture.

We are working on longer term solutions of course, but that is the baseline on which we will be able to sustain ourselves while we re-organize and prepare for greater things.

Are you in?

If this is your issue: do it. $250? $100? $25? Whatever you can contribute is an investment in the future that you want to see come to fruition. Donate and join a community with a solid goal and the ability to get there.

Thank you.

I’ve been working really hard on figuring out how to get the Open Forum Foundation funded, and frankly – it’s a struggle. It’s not so much from failure of my attempts, as it is with discomfort with the options I see available, and a lack of clarity around what to do about it.

So check this out:

1. The average person doesn’t like being asked for money. It’s irritating if there’s no definite personal reward in it, it distances people, and makes them wary of you. While money is not really a dirty subject, it’s taboo in strange ways. Generally speaking, people don’t like to talk about it, and the worst part of a meal out with a group of friends is frequently the part when the check arrives.
2. Large donors are hard to find. This is intentional, of course. If you’re going to give away money, you don’t want everyone asking you about it. You want to make those choices on your own time and make sure they are good ones that support the things that are important to you. Unfortunately, this creates a sort of sneaky, research-and-network-with-the-specific-intention-of-meeting-high-profile-individuals mode of operations that I am just not well suited for.
3. Foundations are difficult. I know, also by design. They tend to be insular with two options for approaching them: run the application gauntlet where you’re being judged on your ability to write effectively; or get to know them personally, where you’re being judged (primarily) on your personality. Finally, if you do get a grant, it normally comes with all sorts of limitations on what you can do with it. Difficult. Time-consuming. Rarely collaborative.
4. Corporations – I’m not even sure what to say. From a corporate perspective, there are two reasons to give money: PR, or supporting something that’s good for your business (there’s also the passion-of-the-CEO reason, but let’s lump that in with option 2 above). Is accomplishment of our mission good for business? Depends on which company I suppose, but in large part the companies with money to throw around are rather fond of the status quo. This can also introduce concerns about conflicts of interest, which is particularly relevant in the government space.

So if I don’t like the available options, where does that leave me?

Let’s start with an ideal world – if I could create my own model of engagement with potential donors, what would that look like?

1. Well first of all, I don’t think I’d call it fundraising (I wrote previously about friend raising, but really! While the idea is sound, the name is awful). The reality is that it’s not just about raising money. It’s about building a community of people that understand the importance of what you’re doing and are willing to participate in seeing it come to fruition. Donating money is only a piece of this.
2. Everyone that participates should get more out of it than they put into it. They should participate in whatever way they are comfortable with, and always see the value that their contribution is making in the bigger picture.
3. The organization should touch enough lives and create enough difference that it can sustain itself on the contributions of individual, small donors.
4. New initiatives may require larger donations, eg from foundations, corporations, or large donors in order to get off the ground and prove their worth.

So what we’re talking about here is a model of engagement that we are well-positioned to move on. Our reputation in the government communication space is that we are committed to forwarding the space and not to benefitting ourselves and we already have a couple of great projects underway (most prominently GovLuv and CongressCamp) that could benefit from additional participation, if we open up to it up and make it easy for people to engage.

Let’s look at the basic building blocks of doing this:

1. Build trust. Before people will commit to participating, they need to understand where we’re going, how we plan to get there, why we’re the right people for the job, and THEN: how they can be involved.
2. Gain recognition. The next piece of the puzzle is to reach out to enough people. The rule on web content is that 90% of people will read it, 9% will comment on it, and 1% will create it. If we’re only going to get 1% actively participating, we need a big number to be that 100%.
3. Find evangelists. This helps with the previous item by duplicating our efforts multi-fold. It’s not enough to reach out to all of our friends; we must excite, encourage, and engage them in our vision, so that they reach out to their friends and so on, spreading the word and finding more participants.

That doesn’t sound so bad. I mean it’s not easy, but what did you expect? Is anything worth doing ever easy until after you’ve accomplished it?

So then, what are the steps to creating a fully funded non-profit that can stand on its own?

1. Mission. It needs to appeal to the people that you want to get involved. It should touch them in a personal way. Seth Godin often writes about the value of niche marketing. You don’t need everyone to be involved in what you’re doing, you just need the people who are passionate about it. And once you’ve gotten all of them, then you can focus on impassioning the rest of the world.
   Oh yeah – and you have to mean it! You have to live by your mission. Everything the organization does, what it stands for, and how it conducts itself all need to align with the change you are promoting to the outside world. To create real change, become that shiny castle on the hill!
2. Activities. What do you want people to do? How are they going to participate? Different people are ready for different levels of commitment, so don’t forget that . Maybe you need people to follow your activities (email, twitter, facebook, …), get connected to you and one another, offer their expertise, contribute time or effort or money. Whatever it is, be prepared and have a plan. If 100 people showed up at your door right now and wanted to help, what would you have them do?
3. Find the audience. How you do this will depend on the audience that you currently have the ear of and the audience that you are attempting to connect with. Use your networks, both online and off. Reach out to them. Tell them what you’re doing. Tell them what you need. Tell them why it’s important. And this may just be my personal perspective, but try to avoid use of the word help. I think people are tired of being asked to help nonprofits. This only serves to further the idea that nonprofits are powerless entities that require YOU to save them, when this isn’t the case. As nonprofits, we are servants. We don’t NEED help, we provide it. We are leaders who are pursuing visions of a better world, each in our way. We are often the experts at what we do, and there is no viable business model for accomplishing our vision, or we would have taken that easier path in the first place. Lead with your strengths, target your niche, reach your audience.
4. Keep them engaged. As people begin to show up, there is another level that you need to be prepared for. How do you keep them coming back? How do you keep them informed? Do you make it easy for them to contribute in ways that you haven’t even thought of? Is there space for them to be creative, to take responsibility, to excel each in their own way? What are you offering that they can’t get anywhere else? It’s not enough just to reach out to people today. Once you’ve awoken that passion for your issue, you need to do something with it. You should have an idea of what this is before they start arriving. Participation should last until the issue is resolved or their passion for it wanes due to reasons beyond your control.

Wow. So those are the basics. Pretty succinct, and I would even argue: doable.

But here’s the real point of this post: What does this mean for me? Here’s my proposition:

Empowering responsive government is about citizens having their voices heard. Our job at the Open Forum Foundation is to provide vision, direction, organization, connections, and consistent leadership that can bring this to fruition. We need to live by our mission and repeatedly show our ability to accomplish projects that move this vision forward.

In terms of a plan of action, these are my next steps:

1. Mission. While the wording is still being worked out, I realized at the last board meeting (thanks, Noel!) that the mission of the Open Forum Foundation is only communication-oriented in terms of our activities, and that the actual vision that we’re pursuing is ‘responsive government’. I need to get that further clarified and finished up. There are also a few things that should be publicly available on the website that I just haven’t been able to get put up so that we can live by our creed of transparency and responsiveness.
2. Activities. There are a number of activities that I could use help with. Why don’t I have them listed on the website? Why don’t I have an entire page dedicated to how to get involved? I will soon! And one of the activities is donating. For some people, it will be the only activity they participate in. For others, it will be part of the mix. Creating this page will be invigorating for me. It will establish a series of goals that I need to accomplish: Step 3.
3. Find the participants. How do I find the right people to complete all of the activities on that page? I’m really looking forward to this. I have wanted to reach out to the community that I’ve been building, but never knew what to reach out to them about. Depending on the individual, I’ll use Twitter, email, LinkedIn, Facebook, phone calls, and face to face meetings. How exciting!
4. Keep them engaged. This piece then becomes about keeping everything and everyone up to date. We have a website, a blog, several Twitter accounts, and email lists. Different people will require different information on different schedules and in different ways. I may even start a weekly conference call or web meeting to go over what we’ve accomplished in the last week.

Good. Done. Thank you.

If you have comments, I’m open to them. I know that I have a lot left to learn.